Hispano Mozarabic Rite

Re: Santo Domingo de Silos

BILTMORE highlights the beginning point of an amazing American saga.

Roosevelt and el Africano
Gifford Pinchot Sycamore
and Bataan Corregidor Memorial Bridge
This crude marker board sketch is a rough history of Christendom depicting migrations of sapien populations and militaries.
Notably, it does not include Asia’s land and sea migrations other than a black axial line which was confronted by the French and later the Germans.
Also note that each generalized depiction of mobile civil factors is in actuality a very complicated story in each particular instance.
Pinchot and the Roosevelt Cousins
Clockwise from top:
McKinley, Rockefeller, Roosevelt, Vanderbilt.
RC Missal “Hispano Mozarabic Rite”

The Hispano Mozarabic Rite pertains primarily to the Iberian peninsula in the historical context of Greek, Roman and Muslim influences.

Recalling the great debate:
Republican Candidates Lincoln and Douglas

The Lincoln Douglas debate famously foresaw the 1861 Union’s southern front pushing beyond the confederacy and into conflict with Spain. That occurred in 1898.

Vanderbilt, McKinley, Rockefeller

The gilded age was founded upon the famously monopolistic Trust legal system, essentially until McKinley’s assassination on 9/16/1901

1812, The Treaty of Paris, The Lewis Expedition. Montezuma to Tripoli .
Amphibious warfare.

From Cortez at Moctezuma to Spanish Africa at Tripoli; Spain held middle and South America, the Caribbean, as well as ports and islands around the world on what was called the Silver Road, and much of the Royal Spanish territorial inhabitants concerned themselves with the spice trade.

The Spanish American War Cross and the Western Europe, Africa and Middle East ribbon.
Spanish American War Memorial. Bushnell Park, Hartford, Connecticut.
Effigy of Alice Lee Roosevelt Longworth?

Content here equates to a theorem of Spanish American War connectedness to the “Moctezuma to Tripoli” ideation.

“Rough Rider”
Colonel Theodore Roosevelt.
Harvard undergraduate author of “The Naval War of 1812” . Cowboy of Elkhorn Ranch. Secretary of the US Navy before the Spanish American War, and architect of the Great White Fleet transition from wooden hull and sail to anthracite coal boiler propulsion in steel hulls. Pulitzer Prize Winner for mediation of the Russo Japanese War.
McKinley and Roosevelt (c) 1898
Cornelius Vanderbilt’s Biltmore estate, President William McKinley, McKinley and TR, and the Cartographic Gifford Pinchot; founder of Yale School of Forestry, then first USFS Chief Forester.


As premonished and forewarned by the Lincoln Douglas debate and then seen to occur subsequently relative to the resultant decision therein to proceed as the mobilized aggressor of the US Civil War; the hubris of the Union era’s three campaigns: Civil, Indian and Spanish, led beyond the initial post bellum Union reconstruction presence whilst tribal nations such as the Sioux were extirpated, and soon, after that second Union campaign upon the northern great plains during the Indian campaigns, according to the promise of moldboard and steam power superpower agriculture, mobilized a further southward offensive against Spain whereby the USA annexed all of Imperial Span’s global territory as King Alfonzo el Africano abdicated just prior to Germany’s Kaiser Willhelm III.

At the onset of the USA’s Spanish Campaign, Navy Secretary Theodore Roosevelt personally demoted himself to Colonel of the “Rough Riders” and led the charge up San Juan Hill in Cuba, after Calvary had been forced to disembark over the gunwales of ships like the USS Maine. This, during the landing battle against imperial Spanish troops who were being ousted as an enforcement of the Monroe Doctrine.

The King of Spain at the turn of the century; Alfonzo XIII “el Africano”. The king was one of a series of contemporaneous Western European abdicators of Royal houses, including Kaiser Willhelm III of Germany, which occurred as certain Fascist and Marxist theories were beginning to fester during the years before the World Wars when Spanish and German governments both fell to the deliterious intentions of anti imperial faction. Recall, tragically, that the assassin Leon Czolgostz murdered President McKinley, who had been amongst the last of a gilded age of American leadership and wealth. Yet, the United States of America retained sound governance via the advent of the corporate legal structure which arose posterior to those calamitous years. Notably, in terms of energy and natural resources; Biltmore’s Appalachian Anthracite Trust empire remained functionally intact as a corporate legal structure sufficiently to bring the future air supremacy of the USAAF to Western Europe while WWII Nazi Germany ultimately failed to sustain the Luftwaffe with Ruhr coal. Western European imperialism, fascism and socialism are not the subject of this page. Yet, the revolutionary nature of European political theory and politics, perhaps as early as the French Revolution (and the war of 1812), must be considered.

The previous Spanish Naval hegemony pivots relative to a detrimental Anglo-Spanish conflict which ensued the 1534 Act of Supremacy and crippled the Armada relative to it’s own hegemonic age. Thus, the end of the Catholic armada might be seen as having enabled the full Protestant migration of the Puritans to Plymouth and Boston (see: http://www.leucocephalus.com/navy)

Franklin Delano Roosevelt

Though FDR declared that the attack on Pearl Harbor would “live in infamy”: in both the Pacific and the Atlantic theater; carboniferous organic fossil fuels, particularly in the liquid phase, quickly became the basis of an eventual USAAF air superiority which had much to do with anthracite liquification in Ruhr as a strategic counterpoint to Appalachia in the land of Biltmore.com

Winston Churchill, Franklin Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin were undeniably discussing, amongst other things; a Siberian Jewish “autonomous zone” versus the Zionism of Herzl. And, the obtainment of RAF and USAAF aviation fuel from Appalachia and Texas. Yet, also, contemporaneous negotiations sought a new form of Islam called Wahhabism, which partitioned South Arabia into the control of the anthropocentric ecological vantage of King Ibn Saud, as the British continued the negotiations with the Iranian Shah that had begun in 1901.
Wahhabism and Zionism

In the global WWII conflict where natural resources like steel, liquid bio-carboniferous fossil derivatives and fuels, silk, cotton, copper, saltpeter, jute, natural rubber and brass were all vital concerns underlying land and marine tactical concerns, and prior to perhaps 100,000,000 souls lost to communism; Stalin’s solutions to “the Jewish problem” were simply unacceptable.

It is here postulated that FDR, Churchill, and Stalin were involved in both the salvation of religious persons, and also with the then pre Marshall Plan strategizing relative to the model societies and paradigms of the future, along with concerns and competition about how these competing visions might, quite literally, be fueled.

Ibn Saud

A further postulation: that Zionism and Wahhabism were contemporaneous and that Wahhab built Saud’s place in Arabia. Meanwhile the Crown was concerned with Persia as Royal Dutch Shell and proximal to the Raj.

Note that the continuum of Union era campaigns progresses into the premise of the Western European, African and Middle Eastern decoration shown, and further that a primary aspect of Pacific theater actions need include consideration of Subic Bay in the Philippines.
It is of interest to note that both resource scarcity and territorial considerations are of concern here. CPEC may be seen as a continuation of the Silk Road continuum from the Union era’s first and third campaigns in particular, in a cartographical sense. Natural Resources concern crude oil and alkaloids, as well as mineral wealth, as Russia fights for its grain belt. Accessing such raw materiel with both transportation sector vehicles, vessels and craft, as well as securing the requisite energy for those processes of engineered mobility, are global concerns from the past until today; 2/12/22

Now, CPEC has been under construction since the days of the CCP invasion of Tibet. A Soviet southward advance through Marmara or to the Pakistani coast as an escape from containment into warmer seas remains as obvious in Crimea and across routes like Syria as it was to some at Yalta. China, meanwhile, is still feeding on the Cuban missile crisis’s timeframe of maritime legislative history; like the Magnusen Stevens Marine Fisheries Act and Tonkin Resolution. Legalities of the 30 to 200 mile limitrophe transformation of international territorial waters persist as the Chinese defense of island building and activities around Sri Lanka. Finally, the mission of the Central Intelligence Agency has transformed since agency operations met with a dubious historical precedent during pre-Maoist efforts to defend the Quing and Manchu with a Sino Soviet split aimed at preventing the KGB migration of information distribution systems into the imperial rear during historic troubles in northeastern Asia.

The postulation here is that there is a strategic continuum through the Civil, Indian, Spanish, Western European African and Middle Eastern, and Pacific campaigns. There, Vietnam persists as a valiant stand against the evolutions of Trotskyist governance which killed upwards of 100 million souls across Eurasia by about 1960.

Western European,
Middle Eastern